ообще-то числятся как одни из сценаристов.

о вторых не один творческий человек не станет с таким энтузиазмом провозглашать такое надругательство над собственным творчеством как Он дракон. В третьих все последующее творчество по качеству не слишком превышает оной фильм, следовательно закономерность просчитывается. Следовательно и огорчения я не испытываю, в мире много хорошего книг, фильмов и сериалов которые нужно ещё посмотреть. Дяченко исписисались и уже очень давно, и это нормально.
Надеюсь смайлик понятен, хотя объяснять здесь и некому, кроме нас тут никого нет. )

The Wizard of Oz is rumored to have had up to or beyond seventeen different screenwriters (as well as several different directors) working towards a final script at different times through the development process. But only three are credited.

I wonder if the people who made the film of The Lord of the Rings had ended it with Frodo putting on the Ring and ruling happily ever after, and then claimed that that was what Tolkien "intended..." would people think they'd been "very, very honest to the books"?

По вашей логике - если на кинопоиске и еще где-то указан Гомер (!) - автором сценария фильма "Троя" (но при этом, не упомянут в титрах, что логично), то он им и был, понятно...

Урсула ле Гуин говорила так про (!) американский, да, вот открытие-то для вас будет, сериал.

The film was ultimately directed by Miyazaki's son Gorō, rather than Hayao Miyazaki himself, which disappointed Le Guin. While she was positive about the aesthetic of the film, writing that "much of it was beautiful",[17] she took great issue with its re-imagining of the moral sense of the books and greater focus on physical violence. "[E]vil has been comfortably externalized in a villain", Le Guin writes, "the wizard Kumo/Cob, who can simply be killed, thus solving all problems. In modern fantasy (literary or governmental), killing people is the usual solution to the so-called war between good and evil. My books are not conceived in terms of such a war, and offer no simple answers to simplistic questions."
She stated that the plot departed so greatly from her story that she was "watching an entirely different story, confusingly enacted by people with the same names as in my story". She also praised certain depictions of nature in the film, but felt that the production values of the film were not as high as previous works directed by Hayao Miyazaki, and that the film's excitement was focused too much around scenes of violence. Her initial response to Gorō Miyazaki was "[I]t is not my book. It is your movie. It is a good movie".[2] However, she stated that the comment disclosed on the movie's public blog did not portray her true feelings about the film's vast departure from original stories; "taking bits and pieces out of context, and replacing the storylines with an entirely different plot..."